Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Kapoor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:56, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Kapoor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:NACTOR , Being wife of an Indian Musician doesnt pass this for an stand alone Article. Shringhringshring📞 11:54, 6 June 2019 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 18:09, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shringhringshring📞 11:54, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:56, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:56, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:56, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:09, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as has prominent roles in many notable television series and therefore passes criteria 1 of WP:NACTOR (only one criteria needed), thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:48, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The wedding coverage is typical Indian news gossip coverage, don't let it fool you into thinking she is not already notable.--Milowenthasspoken 14:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This article is a prime example of what is wrong with this website. Appearance does not equal notability when there are no reliable sources to prove that. That NACTOR interpretation is getting abused left and right around here. All the article says is she is an actress who got married. Then an unsourced laundry list. With poor sources about her wedding. Trillfendi (talk) 16:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:52, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.