Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solid Waste Association of North America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dr. Universe (talk) 18:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Solid Waste Association of North America

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~References do not show WP:SIGCOV and do not meet WP:GNG. RaziNaama (talk) 12:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)~~Strike sock, blocked for sockpuppetry. Raymond3023 (talk) 12:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:16, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:16, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My WP:BEFORE finds copious references to this organization in RS, however, they are all passing mentions in WP:CHURNALISM referencing reports and studies the association has released. Though there are many sources, they don't rise to the level of WP:NCORP. Chetsford (talk) 07:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 14:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:34, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~should this be kept, closing admin should check for copyvio. Portions appear to be lifted directly from here including the capitalization of 47 Chapters. Star Mississippi 14:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)~~ this has been handled, thanks onel5969. Star Mississippi 13:36, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Given the addition of sources by Eastmain. Raymond3023 (talk) 12:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still not sold on the article and where the consensus of this debate sits, plus some eyes on potential copyvio would also be nice.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the copyvio issue has been dealt with. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:32, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Articles seems updated now. Copyvio issues are fixed and additional refs seems enough to make this page stick. Slovenichibo (talk) 07:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.