Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalkal Carty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 23:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shalkal Carty

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of countless promotional non-notable artist wiki pages entirely created by one new user. 6 Google News hits from really non-notable sources, and that's it. A desperate attempt to raise the profile of the subject. Fred Zepelin (talk) 03:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Music. Fred Zepelin (talk) 03:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, Dance, Jamaica, and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, only primary sources located. Mach61 (talk) 04:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, There seems to be more than enough references to keep a posting about Shalkal Carty. I think that the page certainly is within the realm of the spirit of Wikipedia. Feerfox (talk) 15:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the sockpuppet discussion involving this voter. Fred Zepelin (talk) 21:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feerfox has been confirmed as a sockpuppet. I feel confident that striking that vote is in order. Fred Zepelin (talk) 01:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, The article has been written in a neutral point of view and needs citation for the points that lack them. It should be have been tagged with need for verification rather than asking for deletion of the page. Showergirl (talk) 16:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 23:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, The article satisfies all Wikipedia guidelines and meet requirements for notability. It should be kept for future improvements by editors Augmere40 (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 23:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.