Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SantanaRecordsss

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as A7, G5, G11. (non-admin closure) —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 10:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SantanaRecordsss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved to draftspace for development and returned to mainspace without improvement. The item has no sourcing and 'Google' search reveals no 'hits'. The item itself says that the label is both 'defunct' and 'not yet formed'. It seems that there is little reason why it should be considered an encyclopedic entry. There also seems to be a COI issue. Eagleash (talk) 02:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eagleash (talk) 02:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.