Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronja Maltzahn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 00:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ronja Maltzahn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Rajeev Gaur123 (talk) 11:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, and Germany. Rajeev Gaur123 (talk) 11:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rajeev! I find the article to be necessary, since it clarifies the life of Ronja, that has been in the talks of youtubers, tv and printed media because of the issue mentioned in the article, about Cultural Appropriation. When people search for the character mentioned, Wikipedia is a source of clarity. \**|Fedesav|**/ Insomnio Rock! (talk) 11:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Women. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Source 7 Der Spiegel is fine, so is this [1] and another half dozen hits in DE media in Gnews. Oaktree b (talk) 14:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: as per Oaktree b, secondly i think there are already very few women's articles on Wikipedia, so it should not be deleted, we have to take women forward. in October 2014, only 15.53% of English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 23:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Already clearly met GNG per sources in article. I added another one, so even more so now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Central and Adams (talk • contribs) 16:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.