Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quiver (Monk album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quiver (Monk album)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NSINGLE without any considerable RS. Chirota (talk) 22:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 22:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 22:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 22:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no reliable sources found. 00:26, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Redirect to Monk (assuming the band article survives the AfD). Apart from the Allmusic review, I found just another review published by The Cincinnati Enquirer, which are not enough for a standalone article for an album that has not otherwise received enough coverage, has not charted on the national music charts, or garnered any certifications or accolades.--Ashley yoursmile! 07:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I didn't find any reliable sources. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.