Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychomusicology: Music, Mind and Brain
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There are no reasons given to keep this article, and there's no consensus about a merge or redirect target. Sandstein 14:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Psychomusicology: Music, Mind and Brain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases (see MIAR), no independent sources. Tagged for notability since almost 2 years with no improvement forthcoming. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 10:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 10:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Merging to American Psychological Association would be preferable. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment APA publishes many journals. We can't include all of those in that article and it would be kind of weird only to merge the non-notable ones and not cover the notable ones... --Randykitty (talk) 16:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: There isn't a list article either, so we have no sources and no merge/redirect target... --Randykitty (talk) 12:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.