Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Woodbridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:55, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Woodbridge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was incorrectly tagged for CSD by an IP editor who said "... please delete at request of Peter Woodbridge, to whom this page refers ..." [1]. I declined this request per WP:NOTCSD as "Article subjects do not have an automatic right to have their articles deleted". However, I believe this BLP fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC and am nominating it for deletion with the request that the closer observe WP:BIODEL which provides for deletion at the subject's request if any result of the AfD other than consensus to Keep occurs. Chetsford (talk) 03:05, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing in the article suggests major impact on the field (award, write-ups, etc.). GScholar search shows average citations - co-authored article with ~150, then ~50, and less, not a single single author piece in the top 10 most cited works. Concur likely fails WP:NPROF. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the articles referenced seem to be about the YouTubes for Coventry, not really about him. Bearian (talk) 15:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.