Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parallel Economic Model

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Parallel Economic Model

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely unreferenced. Self-promo by single-purpose account that authored the article. Is this WP:FRINGE? Mikeblas (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced, and all the information I could find comes from SPS such as Substack and Medium. Not a good sign. Looks WP:FRINGE to me, and while that doesn't necessarily mean we shouldn't have an article on this topic, we need actual reliable sources, and I don't see any. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The text, created by a single-purpose account, is entirely unsourced and full of opinionated verbiage. A spectacular specimen of personal work aspiring to get onto Wikipedia. -The Gnome (talk) 10:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Stayed long enough already, obviously OR. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can't find anything that suggests notability --Devoke water 21:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.