Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper + Plastick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paper + Plastick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, as per source searches. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:Corp and is local trivia; Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Kierzek (talk) 18:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No notable content, just a blathering quote and a bunch of random lists. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 01:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough evidence of significant notability. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 03:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and WP:NCORP and WP:SPIP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.