Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PURE:FM (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete An article on this topic has already been merged once. Jclemens (talk) 05:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- PURE:FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable student radio station. Cameron Scott (talk) 15:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Since no sources are presented to demonstrate significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, and it is not a licensed broadcast station, but just a student internet radio operation. An alternative would be a slight merge (Smerge) of a sentence or two to the "Student activities" section of University of Portsmouth. No extensive listing of everyone who was ever a functionary in the station's operation should be included, nor should the text include a listing of programming, per WP:NOT. Edison (talk) 17:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge As the station is neither a significant radio station nor an FM licensed station feeding additional information into the already existing entry in the "Student activities" section of University of Portsmouth should be sufficient. Information about founding year, notable achievements, notable associations and notable alumni would be worth adding. Agree with Edison on this being in accordance with WP:NOT. Thegermanbloke (talk) 22:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.