Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niraj Rai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Niraj Rai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable figure in India. Article full of bogus claims such as "He is the first scientist who established ancient DNA research in India", all the media coverage cited are for the work of K. Thangaraj and NOT the subject. Educationtemple (talk) 14:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Almost feels like a hoax article. Wgolf (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The first reference shows he is a bona fide researcher at the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology and works for K. Thangaraj, but the second indicates he does not satisfy WP:ACADEMIC on his own. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:24, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Many news reports do not even mention him. WP:ONEEVENT applies. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a hoax, but as Clarityfiend has noted, the subject does not satisfy WP:ACADEMIC. And as Redtigerxyz pointed out, most of the cited sources do not even mention the subject, or mention him in passing as a member of the research team. Abecedare (talk) 17:07, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 17:07, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 17:07, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.