Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightingale Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Wood Green. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nightingale Primary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thisprimary school has zero refs, and has been tagged for that and for lack of notability for nearly 3 years. Appears to be non-notable, per wp standards. Epeefleche (talk) 01:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of schools in Haringey per established consensus that the vast majority of primary schools are not notable, with the exception of a very few of genuine architectural or historical significance. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect either to the education section of Wood Green where it is already listed, or to List of schools in Haringey. Either way, there is no need to delete it (as per Cullen) - non notable primary schools are generally redirected unless there is no proof they exist. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to city or school district, per the well-established general consensus here for the vast majority of K-8 educational institutions. Since it seems there are a fairly vast number of AfD challenges of elementary schools today, I'm going to copy-and-paste this where appropriate, with apologies. The rule of thumb to redirect elementary schools and keep secondary schools is a necessary thing, a good compromise between those wanting a narrow, focused encyclopedia and those wanting a vast, expansive one. Rather than going to war over the notability or lack thereof of dozens or scores or hundreds of schools each day, we have a streamlined and ultimately effective process that most everyone can live with. Apologies to the creators of affected pages, but it really does need to be this way, in my opinion... Carrite (talk) 07:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the {{R from school}} template on the redirect page. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not unreasonable that other schools may have the same name and a mass redirect to Haringey might cause some confusion over at the search engines. Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Having the same name is not a criterion for deletion. For such cases, Wikipedia has WP:Disambiguation pages and/or WP:Hatnote that are for this purpose. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into the list in Wood Green, where it is. This is the best solution for Primary Schools and preserves the limited information in this sub article. Peterkingiron (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No useful content and no assertion of notability. Pit-yacker (talk) 15:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.