Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MusicRadar (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Future plc. Any sourceable content can be merged from the history. Sandstein 08:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MusicRadar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This (barely) survived AfD back in 2008, but it's had 15 years to improve since then and hasn't; it's still sourced entirely to itself. This wouldn't be a routine deletion—because a lot of Wikipedia articles reference it, outright deletion would leave a huge trail of redlinks—but IMO it should be redirected to Future plc. (This is a topic on which it's very hard to do a viable WP:BEFORE, as any search on it brings up a zillion Wikipedia mirrors, but I can't find any significant coverage of this specific website as opposed to coverage of content hosted on it.)  ‑ Iridescent 06:15, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 07:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.