Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Khalifa (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:51, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Khalifa (song)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Song does not meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains^(talk) 03:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The song has reached number one on the Global viral 50 chart on Spotify, has 16 million views and sources on it LilliamPumpernickl134 (talk) 03:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the song detailed in reliable sources? Meatsgains^(talk) 03:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The best source I could find is this opinion piece in the Minnesota Daily. @LilliamPumpernickl134: See WP:BADCHARTS which says "Spotify: Charts pertaining to only one specific retailer should not be used." Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 06:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 14:16, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A song by a non-notable musical duo, and all the sources given are trivial, with no significant coverage is found in a search apart from one that mentions the song - [1], and a few other passing mentions in blogs and other trivial sources. The song itself appears to have been viewed a lot on YouTube, but with no significant independent coverage, it fails WP:NSONG. The article can be recreated if better sources turn up. Hzh (talk) 10:49, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.