Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mexico–Ukraine relations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 10:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Mexico–Ukraine relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
another random combination, most coverage is in football or multilateral context. Spanish search and English search noting this usual want to boost relations agreement. LibStar (talk) 09:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Relationship not notable per Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Notability_of_bilateral_relations_articles Habanero-tan (talk) 12:26, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No relaible sources adress these relations in any depth. Hipocrite (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article has no useful content. No sources discuss these relations. Johnuniq (talk) 04:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Twelve years in terms of international relations is not anywhere near enough time to make a relationship notable in world affairs. Unremarkable. --BlueSquadronRaven 05:12, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't the length of time is that relevant, some nations (especially if closely located) have a better chance of developing notable relations in a short period of time, this one though clearly fails. LibStar (talk) 05:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources that discuss the topic of an encyclopedia article? Then no encyclopedia article.Bali ultimate (talk) 06:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.