Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehad Hamad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrClog (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mehad Hamad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BLPPROD requirement of articles containing "no sources in any form". However, it does not meet the requirement of "All BLPs must have at least one source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article". Dead external link. Snowycats (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Snowycats (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article, no citation exist in article and also the artist is not notable.Forest90 (talk) 17:40, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as multiple reliable sources have been added to the article such as from The National newspaper, reference 3 is the best, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:08, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Added citations satisfy basic notability criteria. Bondegezou (talk) 15:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The current sources are sufficient to demonstrate notability. Mccapra (talk) 03:35, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - WP:BASIC and WP:NMUSIC seem satisfied Nosebagbear (talk) 18:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.