Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manufactured Music (label)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Manufactured Superstars. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manufactured Music (label)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can be merged to Black Hole Recordings or Manufactured Superstars with little information. The label doesn't show any significant importance for it's own article, neither there are any sources. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 12:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Colorado. Skynxnex (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just put some sources on there earlier. Dogperson160 (talk) 22:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this is a new article that is still being worked on, but I see no reason why it shouldn't redirect to Manufactured Superstars. I removed the list of 160 songs from the label as clearly excessive. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just put it back. This wasn’t the only article about a music label to have all of the releases on it. Dogperson160 (talk) 23:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I don't believe any record label article on Wikipedia should list all of their releases – that contravenes WP:NOTDATABASE and isn't what Wikipedia is for. The focus should be on a discussion of the label. Richard3120 (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Manufactured Superstars. Nothing wrong with Wikipedia providing discographical information, which is encyclopedic, but the roster of artists for this label is underwhelming and I don't see a strong case that it needs a separate article from its founding members. Chubbles (talk) 16:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and delete history prevent future public relations activity. Target is barely notable. Graywalls (talk) 03:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect after merging whatever is considered appropriate into Manufactured Superstars, this company doesn't meet our notability critieria, insufficient sources for GNG/NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - I don't really see what should be merged. I don't see the label having any particular cultural or artistic impact, and a discography such as this might be better served at discogs for which we have a linking template. Except for the catalog, (agree in most circumstaces with Richard3120 here), we don't really have anything about the label. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.