Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Croatian-Australian Socceroos
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete / Categorise (it's the intersection of two categories anyway). Black Kite 00:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Croatian-Australian Socceroos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Content can be covered in a category, not worthy of an individual page GiantSnowman (talk) 01:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman (talk) 01:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and convert to category per nom. At first, I thought this would be a non-notable junction, but the high number of blue links seems to indicate that it could be a useful category.(P.S. "Socceroos" is cute; 'roos are my second favorite animal.) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Do as suggested in nomination. Renee (talk) 02:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hold Once it can be absorbed as a sub-cat and that category explained then fine with a Delete per nomination move. Alexsanderson83 (talk) 03:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral at the moment, but if the names aren't related back to WP:RS, then it will be a delete. fchd (talk) 06:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Nick Dowling (talk) 07:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment if reliable sources and information about caps(goals) years etc could be added I would be more inclined to keep, although a rename would definitely be in order. If no improvements are made I'll !vote delete. English peasant 09:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the category:Croatian Australians is enough. Punkmorten (talk) 16:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --House of Scandal (talk) 19:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to category/delete this page--VS talk 20:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Categorise; list doesn't hold any information that a proper category could not. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. some of the players listed here have limited if not questionable Croatian heritage. Its not really worthy of a list article anyway - Tomperc (talk) 10:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.