Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libvisual
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:49, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Libvisual (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No proof of notability is made, no sources cited and I cannot find any. The GitHub repository also has only 70 stars which further suggests a lack of notability. —Panamitsu (talk) 01:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Partial merge (1 or 2 sentences probably) to Amarok (software) which is probably the most famous software to incorporate this library. —siroχo 07:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NSOFT. Amarok (software) doesn't even mention it now. Owen× ☎ 12:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The lack of sourcing and available sources fail in terms of proving any notability. GuardianH (talk) 07:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Surprising that the article has survived this long. Fritzmann (message me) 01:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.