Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Abramson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 09:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Lee Abramson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of satisfying WP:GNG. Most of the references provided appear to be from primary sources, blogs, etc., and the possible WP:RS all appear to be local coverage that doesn't show how WP:CREATIVE is met. Kinu t/c 04:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Lee is an artist with a known public disability. The sources include news articles, ONE blog, his bands sites, and his personal campaign website. It isn't all "local" coverage...there are several sources that are outside of his area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teeohhem (talk • contribs) 01:25, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: the article shows that he received some secondary reliable coverage, and further coverage is easily foundable via Google. The WP:ITSLOCAL argument does not affect the notability of a subject. Cavarrone (talk) 12:18, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep: Marginally notable. Just enough secondary sources to pass muster.--JayJasper (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.