Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lara M. Schwartz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 00:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lara M. Schwartz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a music video director, not properly sourced as passing notability criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their work exists, and have to show evidence of passing one or more criteria for notability -- significant awards, evidence of third-party reliable source coverage and analysis about them and their work in media and/or books, etc. -- but this literally just says she exists, lists a bunch of jobs she did, and sources all of it to a single directory entry.
This is not enough in and of itself, and she needs either a significant volume of WP:GNG-worthy coverage about her, or a stronger notability claim than just her work's existence. Bearcat (talk) 16:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Women. Bearcat (talk) 16:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Largely OR, as nothing is cited. One source used doesn't possibly contain this much info... The only source I can find is a one-line mention [1], confirming the person exists, but that's not enough for notability here. Oaktree b (talk) 20:53, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Normal Gsearch turns up Amazon and book publisher links, for a recent book the individual is selling. I can't find reviews of the book, so no chance at AURHOR either. Oaktree b (talk) 20:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.