Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisa Krylova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:28, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alisa Krylova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a claim for notability, but article looks as very promotional in it's current form and not encyclopaedical. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the image on Commons is a pretty clear copyright violation, and this article's content follows in the same style— it's not a copyright violation, it is a violation of policies regarding promotion and notability. Subject may be notable, but the evidence for this, if true, is all in Russian. No corresponding article on the Russian Wikipedia. Circular file. KDS4444 (talk) 15:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:59, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:35, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - The subject has received at least some non-trivial international coverage and is a former Mrs. Russia (which I assume is a notable title). [1][2][3][4][5]- Mr X 16:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though needs less promotional rewriting, granted. Corresponding article on Russian wikipedia. In addition to MrX's list, here is more coverage from The Telegraph: [6]. --GRuban (talk) 19:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I also found/made a non-copyright violation image. --GRuban (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Needs improvement and more verification, but the subject appears to meet WP:GNG criteria.--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.