Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killersound

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Killersound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a single purpose account in 2009 and PRODed a couple of days later. It survived but has had no significant improvements in ten years. It’s still largely unsourced and the two sources provided relate only to tangential details and are now dead anyway. If this is notable it needs a lot of work, but I think it isn’t. Mccapra (talk) 11:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 11:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 11:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 11:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 11:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 11:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: An article describing the subject's changing business model during its company lifespan, but without evidence provided or found to indicate attained notability whether in the music library, ringtone or Flash markets. The brief mention in a Q&A with Deadmau5 hardly supports the claim it is referencing and is in any case insufficient for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 10:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.