Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K2-183b

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:22, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

K2-183b

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Again, fails WP:NASTRO. Another one of many from the recently-published K2 paper, with no coverage at all beyond the standard catalogues. Lithopsian (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Like K2-187b, this is another planet from Exoplanet Explorers. Its unique for being one of the shortest-period Sub-Neptune planets as well. In addition, there are two more candidates in the system that were not mentioned by Mayo et al and orbit between K2-183b and c. ProtoJeb21 4:00 pm, 4 March 2018 (EST)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Redirect as non-notable in the Wikipedia sense per WP:GNG. Praemonitus (talk) 22:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Redirect. Not enough information for an article, even a stub. This belongs as an entry in a table, not as a standalone article. Tarl N. (discuss) 16:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.