Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Brahms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:33, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Brahms

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage. While the original Japanese voice roles might show notability for those people, I'm not seeing how the English dubs are significant without proof of those being significant. SL93 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Anime and manga, and United Kingdom. SL93 (talk) 22:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the specific article as the alternative to delete. Fade258 (talk) 14:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fade258 What do you mean? It can only be redirected to one article. SL93 (talk) 22:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SL93, I have updated my comment. Fade258 (talk) 03:59, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fade258 There is no specific article. SL93 (talk) 15:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, No significant coverage in current sourcing. Searching found nothing helpful. Lacks the coverage needed for notability. Gab4gab (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.