Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Loud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

House of Loud

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct NN recording studio, fails the GNG and WP:ORG. A fair number of namedrops in reliable sources, but not a single bit of the "significant coverage" about the subject the GNG requires. The article lists a number of "notable bands" that recorded there, but WP:NOTINHERITED. Article notability tagged for over a decade. Ravenswing 13:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 13:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 13:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree with the nominator, as the studio has no reliable coverage as an entity in its own right, and it does not get to inherit notability from people who recorded there. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could find no evidence of notability. Boleyn (talk) 09:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.