Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greece–Zambia relations
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Greece–Zambia relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Another one of those X-Y country relations articles that doesn't seem to satisfy WP:N. tempodivalse [☎] 13:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no embassies, few cultural ties, random pairing. - Biruitorul Talk 15:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Once again, a randomly created article that does nothing to assert notability in world affairs, and is not likely to be able to.--BlueSquadronRaven 21:55, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Please can we hold fire on deleting entries on bilateral relations pending the outcome of the central discussion on this class of article? There is growing support for these articles and for a specific guideline to define what makes a bilateral relationship notable - analogous to say WP:music which allows us to rank as notable any musician who’s had a hit in a national chart, even if she hasn’t been the subject of multiple non trivial journalistic or academic studies. Until we have the new guideline editors can spend hours finding sources on these relationships only to see the article deleted by opponents who zealously appeal to a strict interpretation of existing guidelines, which while worthy aren’t specifically tailed to address bilateral relations. Once a specific guideline is in place these articles can be improved accordingly or deleted if they dont meet the agreed criteria – and much less time will be wasted editing in vain and on these ADF discussions. FeydHuxtable (talk) 13:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please try to assess the notability of the article itself, and not vote based on a discussion that might reach no conclusion, for all we know. - Biruitorul Talk 14:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia Dialogue 13:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia Dialogue 13:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete even the Greek govt says bilateral relations are low level. [1] LibStar (talk) 14:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.