Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gloria Campaner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 12:30, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria Campaner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was going to remove the unsourced content from this article but discovered that it is essentially unsourced. Checking online, I found nothing. I don't think she meets our notability requirements as listed at WP:MUSICBIO for this reason. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article states that she has won prizes at major international competitions, and Criterion 9 of is: WP:MUSICBIO Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition. So she does meet WP:MUSICBIO. Sources can be found online - eg re the Paderewski Competition this [1] or this [2], her profile on the Borletti-Buitoni Trust, from which she won a £20,000 fellowship in 2014 [3], possibly this interview in Avvenire [4] (I don't know what constitutes reliable sources in Italy) - and there are other articles, like this one about her becoming artistic director of a musical association [5], and I'm sure it would be possible to find reviews of performances, particularly searching in Italian, Greek, etc. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep There are enough sources which show non in passing coverage online plus the awards as mentioned above that I feel ok voting keep but this cuts pretty thin. JC7V-talk 19:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:27, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.