Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerardo Díaz y Su Gerarquía

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gerardo Díaz y Su Gerarquía

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well the prod was removed, anyway band of questionable notability with no reliable sources. (On another note this is technically a orphan since all the links to Gerardo Díaz go to an athlete, something to keep in mind if that page is ever made) Wgolf (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 21:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 21:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, and probably speedy A7, with no claim of notability in article, and no independent sources I can find with significant coverage. MarginalCost (talk) 21:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Is "have made diverse presentations in cities around México" a claim of importance? Because this is pretty close to being a WP:CSD#A7 speedy deletion candidate. A Google search comes up empty: the only thing that can be verified is that the band exists and that its music is at least partially available on various streaming platforms but I found no significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Pichpich (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't sure which one to pick (And as I said if the athlete page is ever created for the one that has links to this one-just ignore the fact that it was AFD), but yes a speedy would of been good as well. Wgolf (talk) 21:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly does not meet WP:NBAND notability guidelines. Jmertel23 (talk) 22:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete.not significant reliable source , does not meet notability Alex-h (talk) 20:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'd support keeping if and only if there was good evidence of touring per WP:MUSICBIO. Otherwise, this is just one of thousands of local bands. Bearian (talk) 16:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBAND. William2001^(talk) 21:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.