Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GP Records (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G5, creation by a blocked sockpuppet)‎ Materialscientist (talk) 07:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GP Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per the previous AfD, the article fails the requirements of WP:NCOMPANY, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The only source provided does not even mention GP records. Dan arndt (talk) 04:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question: has the nominator fulfilled WP:BEFORE ? Jack4576 (talk) 05:18, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources" suggests he has. LibStar (talk) 06:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this is a direct copy and paste of the previous article that was created by the same editor that was deleted previously. Equine-man (talk) 06:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.