Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disposable Heroes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disposable Heroes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

just a completely random song. didnt chart or anything, wasnt even a single, it just exists -- FMSky (talk) 11:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, and Music. FMSky (talk) 11:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A couple of low-quality sources in the article, but overall it's well-sourced to reliable publications. The fact that it wasn't a single doesn't seem to have prevented it from being discussed in RS. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has multiple articles written specifically about it from reliable publications including Loudwire and Metal Hammer. Just because it wasn't a single or didn't chart doesn't mean it can't have a page.

BoxxyBoy (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep based on existing news coverage provided in the article. Naomijeans (talk) 03:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article has a good amount of information on the song compared to the main Master of Puppets page and contains a good amount of sources. HGP7 (talk) 15:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.