Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dheere Dheere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Not going to relist for a 3rd time; other then the nomination there’s only 1 !vote and little discussion going on. (non-admin closure) Eternal Shadow Talk 15:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dheere Dheere

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable songs that fails WP:NSINGLE. Signature 13:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Signature 13:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:17, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/move into a potential article for the song "Dheere Dheere Se" by the original writers Nadeem–Shravan. The current article is about a single released without an overarching album; from this standpoint, I do not believe the article is without merit. Secondly, there seems to be a reasonable amount of noteworthy coverage of the song itself; the case for keeping this page, however, could be bolstered if the article also went into detail about the Nadeem–Shravan song from 1990. That would introduce even more notable coverage, including potential coverage contemporary to the original song. For a successful model of a similar article, see "I Think We're Alone Now" by Tommy James & the Shondells, a song covered by Tiffany, among others. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The current article, by the way, does have some prose and bias issues, and could use further copyediting. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 00:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.