Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delhi School of Internet Marketing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (WP:SNOW close). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delhi School of Internet Marketing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non notable training institute and not a "school" as such. I am unable to find enough sources for WP:ORGDEPTH or to show why this is significant. There is also no indication that it is accredited. From the looks of it, it is a simply private skills training institute, one among many similar institutes. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:03, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: See this post at COIN. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG; training institutes are not inherently notable and do require a GNG pass Spiderone 13:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as stated, not shown to be notable and reads like a short promo press release. Kierzek (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I've been watching this and there's simply nothing for any actual schools notability, and that says enough alone, regardless of anything else. SwisterTwister talk 19:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is not a single independent coverage of this entity. Anup [Talk] 01:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: My searches are finding nothing to indicate that this training institute (one among many according to its own Socialbeat reference) is notable. AllyD (talk) 08:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:GNG. --Dэя-Бøяg 16:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:COI issues, fails WP:GNG.--CaroleHenson (talk) 11:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Easily fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH. Edwardx (talk) 02:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and others; sleazy product of sockfarm (or indistinguishable from same). - Brianhe (talk) 02:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.