Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DC Kizhakemuri Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DC Kizhakemuri Foundation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Kerala foundation. Authordom (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Authordom (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Authordom (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Authordom (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Authordom (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Authordom (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Authordom (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have 3 perfectly respectable independent references. Rathfelder (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - has a number of RS references. --RaviC (talk) 23:24, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it has multiple reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject already within the article so passes WP:GNG, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reviewers: Please note, the presented sources do not establish GNG. Please review and see if there are any other sources, thanks.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reviewers - please take a look at this one. I'm concerned about it passing WP:GNG. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 19:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.