Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colombia–Estonia relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Valley2city^‽ 06:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colombia–Estonia relations

Yet another one of the (thankfully permanently banned) Groubani series of international relations articles. The one definitely fails WP:N, because (as proven by discussions like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canada–Moldova relations and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laos-Romania relations), mere relations don't confer notability, and I think, in this instance, we don't even have relations between these two countries other than the former recognising the latter's independence from the Soviet Union. Further more, the two don't have embassies in the other country - indeed, Estonia doesn't have a representative for Colombia anywhere. The link provided adds another strike against it by saying, "There are no agreements concluded between Estonia and Colombia." If that little sentence proves this article's non-notability, then I don't know what does. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 15:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - When one side of the relations doesn't even have contact with the other country through an embassy, this set of relations is not notable. Also, per the link above. Jd027 (talk) 16:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am glad the two nations have good relations. However this does not seem important enough to write an article about. Maybe a mention in the history of Estonia's independence from the USSR. Borock (talk) 16:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete After doing several searches and finding absolutely nothing notable about Columbia-Estonia relations (and zero google hits outside of this article for the term itself), I am in total agreement. Cazort (talk) 16:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Estonia doesn't have an embassy in Colombia, and Colombia doesn't have an embassy in Estonia. Neither country has an embassy on Mars, but that doesn't mean that we need an article called Colombia-Mars relations. The articles about the diplomatic missions for both nations are sufficient, and unless there is something newsworthy-- Colombia-Venezuela relations is relevant-- one doesn't need an article about for every possible combination of nation X and nation Y. Mandsford (talk) 19:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. They don't have embassies with each other, and there is nothing to suggest that the relations between the two countries are notable. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 20:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; there's nothing notable here. It's a shame that rubbish like this can't be speedy deleted or deleted via prod. Nick-D (talk) 23:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete How many of these whimsical articles are there? Pastor Theo (talk) 01:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - totally random and non-notable, as shown by firm consensus. - Biruitorul ^Talk 18:15, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, we can also include Estonia–South Africa relations‎ too for deletion. Martintg (talk) 03:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I've seen that it's been proded. If that gets removed, I expect it will be soon up for deletion as well. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 09:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Further comment - Also, I'm off work all week and - with the exception of Wednesday and Thursday am - I've got no plans. So it's quite possible that you'll get quite a few "Random Country A-Random Country B relations" articles that I've nominated this week. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 10:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Content-free article with little potential for growth; the relations are very minor in notability. Διγουρεν_{Εμπρος!} 04:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.