Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Delemotte

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 16:55, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Delemotte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I tagged it for speedy deletion, but another administrator declined it because Delemotte is "associated with notable people". To the extent that's a valid reason for declining an A7, it's certainly not a valid reason for keeping an article. The subject has to be notable in their own right. Bbb23 (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't just do that, I also added a news source where he is name checked. I can't do much more because he appears primarily in French news pieces which will take time to sort out. I am tending towards "keep" or "merge" but I would like to evaluate the news pieces first. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that. It ain't much of a mention. But I'm not invested in this. If the community decides to keep the article, I have no problem with that.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sure, my point was rather than adding a source to an article is a far stronger case for declining a speedy than just "well, it doesn't really look like one I guess" Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of 04:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:54, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.