Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As The Last Blossom Falls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion by Mike 7. (non-admin closure) MikeWazowski (talk) 23:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As The Last Blossom Falls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod, possible WP:COI. No indications of notability for the play or the author. Google search for "As The Last Blossom Falls" "Laurence Sullivan" shows only 9 unique results (18 total), none from reliable sources. Zero results from a Google News search. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mike, You are an incredibly hurtful person, might I say? I believe Wikipedia to be an open source, a cornucopia of knowledge. I recently added 'Mdrama' a legitimate qualification and you deleted it, twice. I have now linked it to prove otherwise. Secondly am I to believe that my play is not a play because google does not link it to enough pages? My five hundred strong audience I believe would disagree with you. Despite your polite greeting you are, actually making me feel horrible, when I have just edited wikipedia in a way I though appropriate, clearly not. Because of your attitude I will be deleting my account. Not because of your actions, I understand the necessity for strict rules of course. So, I shall continue to make theatre until it is deemed famous enough in your eyes, while you continue to spend hours deleting other people's work, in the case my edits, wordlessly... — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheatreMaker (talk • contribs) 21:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

None of which addresses the points I brought up - there are no links from newspapers reviewing the play, no links from reliable sources mentioning the play - only two are not from Facebook, and one of those is the Wikipedia article itself. I never said it didn't exist, I stated (and provided some proof) that there's little indications of notability - if you believe otherwise, please provide proof. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need proof it does of course exist, again I re-iterate that it's not the fact you need to delete it, it is your hideous attitude. I give you full permission to delete the article. The play has already pleased an audience of five hundred and raised money for those made orphan by the tsunami disaster in Northern Honshu last year, so my play has affected the world physically. I look forward to a possible day when it is considered famous enough for wikipedia. As I've said it's not the fact you need to delete it, no, not at all, I understand now that lack of outside sources means a deletion, it is simply a matter of how you've put it, there's factual, neutral and then there's unpleasant you are the latter that is all. Please, delete the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheatreMaker (talk • contribs) 22:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again why have you deleted the Mdrama degree, was a link to university not enough for you? For goodness sake! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheatreMaker (talk • contribs) 22:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.