Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina–Belarus relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 19:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina–Belarus relations

Unsourced stub with no assertion of notability. I can find no reliable soruces on my own that would establish independent notability for this rather obscure bilateral relationship. Bali ultimate (talk) 19:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete, User:Groubani is posting just about every pairing of countries that exists, which would result in 192! possible pairings. While some, like United States-Mexico relations are applicable (as they have standing relations with each other independent of sitting on the United Nations together or participating in the Olympic Games together), random pairings like this without any such formal relations shouldn't have its own article. Toad of Steel (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Per precedents. Dahn (talk) 19:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - random; no hope of salvaging this. - Biruitorul ^Talk 20:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Argentina doesn't even have an embassy or mission in Belarus. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 20:56, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete – Not notable relation. TheAE talk/sign 21:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a directory or a collection of miscellaneous information. Fails WP:N. Edison (talk) 21:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another truly random pairing from the obsessive creator. I wonder if these 2 countries have even talked bilaterally (ie not at a UN function). LibStar (talk) 07:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia ^Dialogue 13:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia ^Dialogue 13:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.