User talk:Pitush Puttar

Copyright problem

Your edit to Jaya Ahsan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:51, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hinduism in Assam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hinduism in Assam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 04:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism in Assam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hinduism in Assam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:59, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hinduism in Assam

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hinduism in Assam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Page Hinduism in Assam exists in article space

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 05:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assamese. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Proposed states and union territories of India. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 01:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NRC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Partition of India into Islam in India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. There is also a practical reason - in your edit you copied a named reference, but the definition was in the page you copied from and needed to be copied into the page you pasted the information into for the citation to work correctly. I have fixed this. -- Toddy1 (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misrepresenting obsolete data as current

Thank you for your interest in improving the article Bangladesh. However, the article by Nurul Alam and Barkat-E-Khuda that you cited does not contain data from 2021. It was published in January 2011, before the 2011 census was conducted, and uses data from 2001 to 2008. The source you replaced was published in 2015, and uses the 2011 census data. Don't replace a more current reliable source with an older one containing obsolete data. Another article you cited is an opinion piece in a newspaper, which is not a reliable source for facts, only for the opinion of the author. Your recent edit(s) to the page have been reverted for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You are also misinterpretating the constitution in the religion section. Please make sure that you're edits are not being biased instead of being equitable. — Meghmollar2017 (U T C) — 09:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pittush puttar

Hello, Pitush Puttar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pittush puttar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Assam into Barak Valley. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indic Script

Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Barak Valley, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Assam into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Please provide Attribution next time you copy from Assam. Thanks. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 18:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Lord 0f Avernus. Your recent edit(s) to the page State religion appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pitush Puttar: Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. also, kindly refrain from spreading communal disharmonyin India. and please do not cite sources without having a look at them. Wikiedit01995 ^talk 15:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to State religion. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Right to Freedom of Religion 25. Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion. — (1) Subject to public order, m orality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion. (2) Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law ( a b — ) regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice; ( ) providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hi ndu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus. Explanation I. — The wearing and carrying of be included in the profession of the Sikh religion. Explanation II. — In subclause ( b ) of clause kirpans shall be deemed to (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly , where does 25-2(b) says hinduism being the national religion. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 16:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Religion in India. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 07:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khasi people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naming.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Your edit to Khasi_people has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, on Hinduism in Assam. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 14:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Popular Front of India has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 18:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hinduism in Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assamese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bengali Hindus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barak Valley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indian reunification

Few editors have reverted your edits there. Use talk page. I have started a section there. See WP:EW and don't edit war. Srijanx22 (talk) 17:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources for biographies of living persons

Thank you for contributing to the article Jaya Ahsan. However, please do not use unreliable sources such websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, or websites that rely heavily on gossip, rumors, and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Sourcing requirements are particularly strict for biographies of living persons. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 00:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are those sources which you have mentioned not reliable? Pitush Puttar (talk) 05:35, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all websites, except for those published by traditional publishers (such as The Daily Star, Dhaka Tribune, governmental organizations, etc.), are self-published, and therefore may not be used as sources for biographies of a living person. Websites celebritycontactdetails.com, instantstories.com, and thepersonage.com have no reputation for accuracy or fact checking, and are self-published. The last is also circular, since it says it gets data from Wikipedia. For more information, see note #9 at the end of Wikipedia:Verifiability. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:No personal attacks

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User:Ftimasheikh450. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. – ².O.^Boxing 10:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This would be the edit in question. – ².O.^Boxing 10:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hinduism in West Bengal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:04, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silchar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bengali and Others.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Bengali Hindus, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:47, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pori Moni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No religion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

RegentsPark (comment) 09:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kamakhya Temple into Khasi people. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sindhudesh movement, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Hey, I noticed that you didn't provide reliable and/or update references for your edits and also they seemed leaning towards Indian POV, hence the changes have been reverted. ⭐️ Starkex ⭐️ 📧 ✍️ 19:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Christianity in India, you may be blocked from editing. Also, see WP:SELFPUB - SUN EYE 1 17:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the edit history list I haven't added those stuffs. I have only added citations and did some minor edits on grammar. Pitush Puttar (talk) 18:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not supposed to do that. You did modify the WP:RUMOUR added by the IP instead of removing it and added a WP:FICTREF which did not back it. This is a clear WP:OR violation. - SUN EYE 1 05:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ethnic groups in Delhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North West Frontier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic groups of Delhi

Hi, it is regarding this edit. I don't see the number "553,604" in the source [1] you added. Can you explain why? or I'm missing something. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the first page of reference itself - Delhi, the brash, bustling Indian capital of today, was, in effect, born in 1947. In the wake of India’s hellish Partition, thousands of Muslims fled, while Hindu and Sikh refugees poured in. Delhi took in nearly half a million refugees (that means a total figure of - 500,000 numerically) from Pakistan in those heady but brutal months before and after August, 1947. Large parts of today’s Delhi grew out of the refugee camps that sprung up along its limits 69 years ago. Pitush Puttar (talk) 17:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see the "half million", but the extra "53,604", where it is written? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Vidarbha movement into Barak state movement. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:21, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islam in Punjab, India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greater Punjab Movement, India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rathi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect referencing

Hi, the reference you added here, opens this homepage, not he particular page that mentions the etymology of Barak. Please link a proper article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kalparnab Gupta

Hello, Pitush Puttar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kalparnab Gupta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bangladeshis in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian Union.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islam in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Your edit to Islam in India has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 22:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Services.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bengali Hindus in Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assamese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Grabup. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dhruv Rathee, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Simply living in Germany with Indian citizenship does not make someone a German-Indian. GrabUp - Talk 08:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is clearly mentioned in the infobox that his location is Berlin, Germany. Adding ‘German’ as his nationality is incorrect. GrabUp - Talk 08:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again

...I have no idea why you're pinging me, and I'm guessing that no one is enjoying these notifications. I just muted you. Drmies (talk) 14:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. Left guide (talk) 05:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited B. Borooah College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Grants Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islam in Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miya.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Neha Mehta moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dr. Neha Mehta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 20:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have modified it as per as the guidelines you have described and shared. Please review. Pitush Puttar (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Neha Mehta (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Neha Mehta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 08:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pitush Puttar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 08:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dr. Neha Mehta

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dr. Neha Mehta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cotton University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pragjyotish College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Grants Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Neha Mehta moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dr. Neha Mehta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dcotos (talk) 16:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir delete it, except those 15 sources there are no other sources available. Pitush Puttar (talk) 16:42, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pitush Puttar Thank you for your contribution! Before publishing, please ensure that all content in Wikipedia articles is written from a neutral point of view. It is essential to attribute all material to reliable, published sources. You may consider rewriting the article, adding more reliable news sources, and then submitting it for review again. Happy editing! Dcotos (talk) 17:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete it sir. There's no source available except 15 sources that I have added. Pitush Puttar (talk) 17:18, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pitush Puttar Please note that if you do not improve the draft within six months, it may be deleted in accordance with guidelines. Dcotos (talk) 17:24, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know that. But is there any way to delete it now ? Pitush Puttar (talk) 04:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There totally is a way to delete pages when you are the primary author of the content, simply add {{db-author}} to the page. In this case I've gone ahead and deleted it, not sure why @Dcotos: did not explain this when you asked. Kind of looks like they are posting canned replies instead of actually responding in their own words. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 00:23, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. Pitush Puttar (talk) 03:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of Science and Technology, Meghalaya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Grants Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gauhati University, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, Italian and Spanish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ex Muslim Sahil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ex Muslim Sahil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ex Muslim Sahil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheChronikler7 (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Violence in the Quran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slay.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

It's odd to me that it seems like you used to know to do this and have stopped doing so for some reason. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 23:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly related to this issue:

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ex Muslim Sahil, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Multiple tools confirm your posts in that discussion were at least partially AI generated. Deletion discussions are debates between human Wikipedia editors. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 00:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]