User talk:Chocolatebear21

Copyright issue with Thornbury-Darebin Secondary College

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Thornbury-Darebin Secondary College, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.thornburyhs.vic.edu.au/findout/location.php. As a copyright violation, Thornbury-Darebin Secondary College appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Thornbury-Darebin Secondary College has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Thornbury-Darebin Secondary College and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Thornbury-Darebin Secondary College with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Thornbury-Darebin Secondary College.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Hut 8.5 12:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

JB Hi-Fi

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you to adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which it appears you have not followed at JB Hi-Fi. Thank you. utcursch | talk 12:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to JB Hi-Fi, you will be blocked from editing. -- Chuq 12:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

Your edits to Sarah Jessica Parker are highly inappropriate and clearly violate two of our key policies: WP:BLP and WP:V. I have blocked you for 31 hours to prevent further damage to Wikipedia. Please take this time to familiarize yourself with the specific policies I have link to as well as our core policies. Please adhere to these when you return to editing or you will be blocked for a more substantial period. Thanks, Gwernol 15:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion candidate

A tag has been placed on Peter Grace, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — BillC ^talk 21:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Removal of Article for Deletion notice

Please do not remove Article for Deletion notifications from the top of articles, as you did at List of famous smokers. If you feel that an article should not be deleted, the thing to do is to take part in the discussion linked in the notice, and show your reasoning there. Thank you. — BillC ^talk 21:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kath And Kim U.S Version

An editor has nominated Kath And Kim U.S Version, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kath And Kim U.S Version and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)