User talk:Adelere13

April 2020

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chris Wood (footballer, born 1991), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

please add the OFC Nations Cup 2012 Champion title that represents the Tahiti national team in the steevy chong hue soccer player article Adelere13 (talk) 21:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this is not true. you do not deserve to be an administrator, wikipedia will monitor you along with your ip address, because the information you change back is incomplete as it is. Adelere13 (talk) 21:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo

Ok, as you do not start a discussion as you should per WP:BRD, i ask you why are you removing the olympic medals from the Marcelo article? Kante4 (talk) 14:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

because olympic medals is not major tournament, only fifa confederations cup marcelo win major tournament. Adelere13 (talk) 06:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Says who? He won a medal and those should be listed. Else start a discussion as you were reverted by several users. Kante4 (talk) 22:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mean major tournament is senior tournament not junior tournament, olympic is juior tournament (U23s). Adelere13 (talk) 05:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And you were reverted by multiple editors, so the next step would be to use the talk page and not just removing it again, that is disruptive. Kante4 (talk) 19:39, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make vandalism Adelere13 (talk) 22:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fernando Llorente, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Fernando Llorente, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Govvy (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

please don't do vandalism Adelere13 (talk) 12:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mohamed Salah, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Paulo Dybala, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

why you change paulo dybala position's? he's attacking midfielder not as a forward Adelere13 (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Paulo Dybala#Style of play. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 18:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pedro (footballer, born 1987), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adelere13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

No reason given, and only one unblock request open at a time. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Heurelho Gomes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bruno Alves, you may be blocked from editing. Unexplained removal of honour. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Bruno Alves. Unexplained removal of honour. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Efe Ambrose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Shinji Okazaki, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 15:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Giacomo Raspadori, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Heurelho Gomes, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me, there's a lot of wrong information on wikipedia, i can report this if u don't unblock me, as a anonymous will share for the people who don't trust wikipedia again... Adelere13 (talk) 10:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Fernando Llorente, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Govvy (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Adelere13 (talk) 06:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 18:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adelere13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have no problems Adelere13 (talk) 06:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 11:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Make sure you copy the unblock template exactly as shown, otherwise it will not work properly. Your answer did not show up until I fixed it. 331dot (talk) 11:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock as a view editing. Adelere13 (talk) 06:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me, there's a lot of wrong information on wikipedia, i can report this if u don't unblock me, as a anonymous will share for the people who don't trust wikipedia again... Adelere13 (talk) 10:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason= Help to update for new information Adelere13 (talk) 11:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

Re-blocked

180.251.211.48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:52, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Adelere13 (talk) 13:28, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me, there's a lot of wrong information on wikipedia, i can report this if u don't unblock me, as a anonymous will share for the people who don't trust wikipedia again... Adelere13 (talk) 10:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason= help to update for new information Adelere13 (talk) 11:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

UTRS appeal #56478

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adelere13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

help to update for new information Adelere13 (talk) 11:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You do not seem to be sufficiently competent enough to even make a plausible unblock request. This will count against you; see WP:CIR. Please read and thoroughly understand WP:GAB before making your next request; it will likely be your last chance. Yamla (talk) 12:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop posting unblock request templates with the same text, i.e. "help to update for new information". Doing it only once is enough, thanks - Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 11:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]