Jump to content

The Babylon Bee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Babylon Bee
Type of site
Satirical publication
Available inEnglish
FoundedMarch 1, 2016
HeadquartersJupiter, Florida, U.S.
Founder(s)Adam Ford
Key people
URLbabylonbee.com
Current statusActive

The Babylon Bee is a conservative Christian news satire website that publishes satirical articles on topics including religion, politics, current events, and public figures. It has been referred to as a Christian or conservative version of The Onion.[1][2]

History

[edit]
This article is part of a series on
Conservatism
in the United States
Schools
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Politicians
Jurists
Commentators
Activists
Literature
Concerns
Parties
Active

Defunct

Think tanks
Media

Newspapers

Journals

TV channels

Websites

Other

Other organizations

Economics

Gun rights

Identity politics

Nativist

Religion

Watchdog groups

Youth/student groups

Miscellaneous

Other

Movements
Related
Portrait photograph of Seth Dillon from the shoulders up, wearing a white shirt and blue jacket, holding a microphone
Seth Dillon, owner and CEO of The Babylon Bee

The Babylon Bee was founded by Adam Ford and was launched on March 1, 2016.[3] It is headquartered in Jupiter, Florida, and employs around 24 people across the United States.[4][5]

In 2017, Hurricane Harvey battered Houston, Texas, causing widespread flooding. In that context, The Babylon Bee satirically criticized televangelist Joel Osteen with a headline that read: "Joel Osteen Sails Luxury Yacht Through Flooded Houston to Pass Out Copies Of Your Best Life Now". The article went viral, prompting a fact check from Snopes.[6][7][8]

In late 2018,[9] Ford sold the website to Seth Dillon.[10] In an interview with the Christian Post, Ford cited several reasons for the sale, including his discomfort with the power wielded by social media companies like Facebook over creators and what he perceived as an anti-conservative and anti-Christian bias.[11] [12]

At the time of the website's sale, Kyle Mann, who had been head writer since September 2016, became editor-in-chief.[13] Ford maintained a financial stake in the site and its sister site Not the Bee until November 2023. Citing the "inevitable consequences of burnout" that came from keeping up with current events, he handed over full control to brothers Seth and Dan Dillon.[10] Seth remained the majority owner of The Babylon Bee while Dan Dillon, who had helped cofound Not the Bee, became its majority owner.[14]

At the time of its sale to Dillon, The Babylon Bee was receiving 3 million page views per month.[10] In October 2020, the website said that it was receiving about 8 million visitors a month.[15] which would have been more than The Onion's traffic in the same period.[2] By January 2021, The Washington Times said that The Babylon Bee was receiving more than 20 million page views per month, had more than 20,000 paid subscribers, and had a Twitter account with more than 856,000 followers.[16] In January 2022, The Economist said that The Babylon Bee was "claiming as many as 25 m[illion] readers a month at its peak", and that Dillon had turned The Babylon Bee "into one of the most popular conservative sites after Fox News".[17]

Content

[edit]

The Babylon Bee began by lampooning a wide range of topics including progressives, Democrats, Republicans, Christians, and Donald Trump.[18][19][15] The purpose of the site, according to its founder Adam Ford in 2016, was not just to evoke laughter, but to prompt self-reflection. "It's important to look at what we're doing, to 'examine ourselves.' Satire acts like an overhead projector, taking something that people usually ignore and projecting it up on the wall for everyone to see. It forces us to look at things we wouldn't normally look at and makes us ask if we're okay with them."[20] In an April 2016 Washington Post profile of the site and its founder, Bob Smietana observed that "The Bee excels at poking fun at the small idiosyncrasies of believers, especially evangelical Protestants."[3] Susan E. Isaacs publishing in Christianity Today wrote in May 2018 that the site "lampoon[ed] the faithful across denominations, political affiliations, and age groups".[19] Emma Green in The Atlantic noted of The Babylon Bee's content in October 2021, "Although political humor drives much of The Bee's web traffic, the publication's signature hits focus on what the writers see as shallowness in the evangelical world."[21]

In the years leading up to 2020, the site grew less critical of Trump and more critical of the left and liberalism, though it continued to satirize topics across both parties.[15] Emma Goldberg of The New York Times said in 2020 that although Trump was still not off limits as a target for The Babylon Bee, "their "early coverage of Trump, back in 2016, was much more vitriolic than today's. They called him a psychopath, or a megalomaniac. Now they're more bemused by him and the ghoulish ways he's described on the left."[2] In another 2020 New York Times article, Emma Goldberg wrote that the unifying goal of the site was "poking fun at the left", and that "their most popular articles are often those making jokes at the expense of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden". She wrote that its success was due to finding ways to punch up by "ridiculing every source of authority outside the White House." In the same article, The Babylon Bee's editor-in-chief Kyle Mann summarized how he believed readers of The Babylon Bee considered the site: "this comedy makes fun of everybody, but it's a little harder on the left, and when it makes fun of the right it's not hateful."[15] Parker J. Bach wrote in Slate in June 2021 that the site frequently makes jokes that target marginalized groups, with articles that are "often 'ironically' misogynistic" and "frequently antagonistic toward the LGBTQIA+ community".[22] In an October 2021 interview with The Atlantic, Mann described the site's view of satire and its mission as "mock[ing] people who hold cultural power and ... communicat[ing] truth to a culture that many times does not believe in an objective, universal truth any longer."[21]

The Babylon Bee's hosted Elon Musk for an interview on the site's podcast in December 2021. The episode featured regular hosts Kyle Mann and Ethan Nicolle, who were joined by Seth Dillon. The podcast covered a wide range of topics, ranging from a response to Senator Elizabeth Warren's criticism of how little Musk paid in taxes[23] to scandals at CNN[24] to his thoughts on Christianity.[25]

Jennifer Graham of Deseret News attributed the success of The Babylon Bee in 2021 to "the increasing polarization in America, with Republicans and Democrats clustering in information silos that reflect and affirm their beliefs."[10] Nick Gillespie of Reason praised The Babylon Bee in 2022, saying that "The fact that the Bee is very funny, day in and day out, is almost enough to get me, a lapsed Catholic, to believe in divine intervention, if not a covenant of grace not works."[26]

Mistaken for factual reporting

[edit]

As the readership of The Babylon Bee increased from 2016 to 2020, there were independent, ongoing discussions within journalistic circles on how to handle the rise of fake news and its influence on the public.[27][28][29] The Babylon Bee was brought into this wider conversation when several of their articles were shared on social media or reported upon, ostensibly as factual.[27][30]

In 2019, The Babylon Bee satirically criticized Donald Trump with an article saying that Trump claimed he had "done more for Christianity than Jesus". The article went viral, prompting a fact check from Snopes after some thought the article was a real story.[17]

The Conversation published research by academics at the Ohio State University in August 2019 that found that people regularly mistook satirical reports from The Babylon Bee, The Colbert Report, The Onion, and others for genuine news. They found that "stories published by the Bee were among the most shared factually inaccurate content in almost every survey we conducted." They also found that both Republicans and Democrats mistook articles from The Babylon Bee as news, but Republicans were considerably more likely to do so.[31] The Babylon Bee's editor-in-chief, Kyle Mann, criticized the research in a conversation with Reason TV, describing it as "methodologically flawed" and saying The Conversation reworded the headlines and took them out of context when asking survey respondents if they thought they were real.[32] Reason's John Osterhoudt said that the headlines had been "stripped of both context and comedy", giving as an example The Babylon Bee headline "CNN: 'God Allowed the Mueller Report to Test Our Shakeable Faith in Collusion'" that was rephrased to participants as "CNN news anchor Anderson Cooper said his belief that Trump colluded with Russia is unshakable; it will not change regardless of statements or evidence to the contrary."[32]

Media outlets' responses to incidents in which The Babylon Bee's content was mistaken for factual reporting have varied. Some have described The Babylon Bee and its content as obviously satirical,[33][15] whereas others have suggested the site misleads its readers, either intentionally or inadvertently.[2] The frequency with which Babylon Bee stories are confused with real news has resulted in numerous reactions from fact-checkers.[34][22]

In September 2020, British newspaper The Guardian reprinted as factual a Bee-doctored image of LeBron James wearing a lace collar supposedly in tribute to Ruth Bader Ginsburg.[35]

In October 2020, a satirical news story by The Babylon Bee claiming that Twitter had been shut down to protect Joe Biden from negative coverage was retweeted by then-U.S. President Donald Trump, who, according to some journalists, seemed to not realize the article was parody and condemned the fabricated incident described in the story as a case of leftist censorship.[36][30] This event prompted Kevin Roose, writing in The New York Times, to question whether The Babylon Bee "traffic[s] in misinformation under the guise of comedy", concluding that "The Babylon Bee is not a covert disinformation operation disguised as a right-wing satire site, and is in fact trying to do comedy, but may inadvertently be spreading bad information when people take their stories too seriously".[2]

Parker J. Bach wrote in Slate in 2021 that The Babylon Bee "is adept at writing ironically ambiguous material that lets audiences from different sections of the right reinforce their own beliefs ... even if The Babylon Bee's satire itself should not be considered misinformation, its satire draws on and reinforces actual misinformation and conspiracy". Bach also described the website's material as "riffs on riffs, building referential jokes atop the already referential right-wing commentary about the untrustworthiness of the news".[22] James Varney wrote in The Washington Times that "Surprisingly often, a short piece from the Bee seems to become real news. A jesting report in the Bee will be fact-checked and censored, usually briefly, by social media platforms" and that "as a consequence, the satirical website has been fondly christened by its conservative blogging brethren as 'the paper of record.'"[16]

Social media and other platforms

[edit]

On several occasions, social media and other platforms have removed content by The Babylon Bee or flagged or suspended its accounts, though some of these actions were later described by the platforms as errors and reversed. Dillon has accused news media, fact-checking outlets, and social media websites of targeting The Babylon Bee in a movement to deplatform conservative or Christian viewpoints, which he has also described as cancel culture.[37][38][39]

In March 2018, after The Babylon Bee's article about CNN "spinning" the news in a large washing machine was classified by fact-checking website Snopes as "false", Facebook sent a notification threatening to limit The Babylon Bee's content distribution and monetization.[22][34][40] Following some controversy, Facebook identified the notification as a mistake and apologized.[34]

The Babylon Bee's Twitter account was briefly suspended in August 2020 after being mistakenly caught in one of the social media company's spam filters.[41]

In October 2020, The Babylon Bee put up a Facebook post linking to a story about the Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination, with the headline "Senator Hirono Demands ACB Be Weighed Against a Duck to See If She Is a Witch" (a reference to the 1975 film Monty Python and the Holy Grail). Citing its policies against incitement to violence, Facebook removed the post and demonetized The Babylon Bee's page on the social media platform.[42] Dillon responded, "In what universe does a fictional quote as part of an obvious joke constitute a genuine incitement to violence? How does context not come into play here? They're asking us to edit the article and not speak publicly about internal content reviews."[42] Also in October 2020, during a Senate hearing on Section 230, Senator Mike Lee referred to The Babylon Bee as a target of social media moderation, which he said was imbalanced and predominantly directed at right-leaning content, groups, and individuals.[43]

The Babylon Bee put up a Facebook post in February 2022 with the headline "Trans Woman Breaks Jeopardy Record, Proving Once and for All That Men Are Smarter Than Women", referencing former Jeopardy! champion Amy Schneider. Facebook removed the post, citing its policies against hate speech. Dillon published a statement that they would be appealing the removal.[44]

Controversies

[edit]

Snopes

[edit]

In March 2018, The Babylon Bee published an article quipping that CNN was using an industrial-sized washing machine to "spin" the news. Two days later, fact-checking website Snopes issued a fact check for the article, rating it "false". Facebook then cited this fact check in a warning message to The Babylon Bee, threatening to limit their content distribution and monetization.[22][34][40] Ford tweeted a screenshot of the warning message, drawing public attention to the matter. Facebook subsequently stated, "There's a difference between false news and satire. This was a mistake and should not have been rated false in our system. It's since been corrected and won't count against the domain in any way."[34]

In July 2019, The Babylon Bee published an article referring to a real-world incident, titled "Georgia Lawmaker Claims Chick-Fil-A Employee Told Her to Go Back to Her Country, Later Clarifies He Actually Said 'My Pleasure'", which Snopes rated "false". They also suggested that the article was deliberately deceptive, rather than genuinely satirical.[18] Ford responded on Twitter, highlighting what he deemed to be problematic wording in the fact-check.[18][45] The Babylon Bee also released a statement, calling the fact-check a "smear" that was "both dishonest and disconcerting".[46] The statement concluded by saying a law firm had been retained to represent The Babylon Bee because "Snopes appears to be actively engaged in an effort to discredit and deplatform us." Snopes later made revisions to the wording of the fact check and added an explanatory editor's note.[47][18] The Babylon Bee's chief executive, Seth Dillon, appeared on Fox News in August 2019 to discuss the incident. He said The Babylon Bee must take the matter seriously "because social networks, which we depend on for our traffic, have relied upon fact-checking sources in the past to determine what's fake news and what isn't. In cases where [Snopes] is calling us fake news and lumping us in with them rather than saying this is satire, that could actually damage us. It could put our business in jeopardy."[18] Snopes' co-founder David Mikkelson acknowledged to The New York Times that their fact-check was poorly written, but denied trying to discredit The Babylon Bee.[18] In an interview with BuzzFeed News, Mikkelson stated, "The question you should be asking is not: 'why is Snopes addressing material from a particular site so often?' But, 'what is it about that site that makes its content trigger the fact-check threshold?'"[40]

In August 2019, Snopes announced a new rating for satire sites called "labeled satire".[48][49] Articles from The Babylon Bee that were previously rated "false" were updated with the new rating.[50] Snopes explains the label: "This rating indicates that a claim is derived from content described by its creator and/or the wider audience as satire. Not all content described by its creator or audience as 'satire' necessarily constitutes satire, and this rating does not make a distinction between 'real' satire and content that may not be effectively recognized or understood as satire despite being labeled as such." Mann objected to this label in an op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal, writing that the label "is meant to suggest that we are somehow making jokes in bad faith".[49]

Twitter ban and reinstatement

[edit]

On March 20, 2022,[51] The Babylon Bee's Twitter account was suspended for tweeting "The Babylon Bee's Man of the Year Is Rachel Levine", referencing the U.S. Assistant Secretary for Health, a transgender woman. Twitter said that the post violated its policy on "hateful conduct". Dillon refused to delete the tweet in order to regain access to the account, stating, "They could, of course, delete the tweet themselves. But they won't. It's not enough for them to just wipe it out. They want us to bend the knee and admit that we engaged in hateful conduct."[52][53] On March 23, Twitter rejected an appeal by The Babylon Bee. Dillon told Fox News that The Babylon Bee was "disappointed" by the rejection, adding, "It doesn't change our position. They can delete our joke if they want. They have that power. But we're not bending the knee and doing it for them." Mann was also locked out of his personal account after tweeting, "Maybe they'll let us back into our Twitter account if we throw a few thousand Uighurs in a concentration camp", referring to Twitter's treatment of accounts associated with the Chinese government.[54] Mann has denied allegations of transphobia, saying "We love trans people", and "We don't consider people like that beneath us. You know, the Christian worldview is that everybody has the opportunity to be saved and we can love everybody. I'm no more deserving of God's grace than a transgender person is. But when the culture bows down and starts handing out trophies to people for stuff like this is when we say, 'Hey, wait a minute, you know, we need to protect women in our society as well.'"[26]

In a statement to The Washington Times on April 4, 2022, the day that Elon Musk purchased a 9.2% stake in Twitter, Dillon revealed that Elon Musk had contacted The Babylon Bee shortly after its Twitter account was suspended. "He wanted to confirm that we had, in fact, been suspended from Twitter. He reached out to us before he publicly asked his Twitter followers if they think Twitter 'rigorously adheres' to the principle of free expression. He even mused on that call with us that he might need to buy Twitter." Dillon added, "I wouldn't suggest that The Babylon Bee is the sole reason Musk decided to take action", but "I do think the absurdity of his favorite satire site getting suspended factored into his decision. Perhaps it was the last straw."[51] Musk has repeatedly spoken positively of the Babylon Bee on Twitter.[55] It was later revealed that Musk's ex-wife Talulah Riley had encouraged Musk to purchase Twitter, specifically citing The Babylon Bee's ban.[56][57][58]

On April 14, Musk made a formal offer to buy Twitter, which was accepted on April 25.[59] He officially acquired Twitter on October 27, and within hours directed the Trust and Safety team to urgently reinstate The Babylon Bee's account. Musk saw The Babylon Bee's suspension as emblematic of what he viewed as partisan, predominantly liberal, moderation overreach that had prompted him to acquire Twitter.[55] In a conference with lawyer Alex Spiro and then-Trust and Safety head Yoel Roth,[60] Musk described The Babylon Bee's tweet about Levine as "not cool", but said it did not rise to the level of violent threats that should trigger moderation action. Roth objected to reinstating the account without a clear reason, and Musk agreed to wait to restore the account until a new content policy could be published.[55] Roth ultimately quit Twitter on November 10. On November 18, Musk reinstated the account.[61][55]

On March 28, 2023, Dillon testified as an expert witness before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce's Subcommittee on Communications and Technology as part of a discussion on regulation.[62]

Other Controversies

[edit]

In November of 2024, the Southern Poverty Law Center published an article aimed at doxing writers from the Bee and Not the Bee in reaction to their views on LGBTQ issues stating that "their hard-right views...have no place in our society."[63] The article obtained the personal information including occupations, full names, and social media profiles of multiple writers and staff from several sources including illegally obtained information from the Elance data breach[64]. Seth Dillon stated the "dox and smear campaign against us wasn’t actually journalism, but an attempt to censor speech they don’t like[65] and Elon Musk called the SPLC a 'criminal organization'[63]

Litigation

[edit]

The Babylon Bee and sister site Not the Bee have been involved in supporting litigation related to free speech-related cases, both through direct lawsuits and the filing of amicus briefs at state and national levels.

As plaintiffs

[edit]

In April 2023, The Babylon Bee, Tim Pool, and the Minds social network filed a lawsuit against the California Attorney General seeking an injunction against California AB 587, which was signed into law in September 2022. The bill requires social media companies to submit reports to the California Attorney General concerning their enforcement of policies against hate speech, disinformation, harassment, and extremism.[66][67] The case was dismissed in August 2023.[68]

Following the passage of AB-2355, AB-2655 and AB-2839, the Bee filed a compliant against the State of California seeking to block enforcement of the latter two bills. Filed by the Alliance Defending Freedom, the complaint alleges that the laws are overly broad and "grant California unbridled enforcement discretion."[69][70] Governor Newsome has stated the bills "help to combat the harmful use of deepfakes in political ads and other content."[71]. Shortly after filing, a federal judge granted an injunction against California's enforcement of these rules stating that they "unconstitutionally stifle the free and unfettered exchange of ideas."[72]

Amicus briefs

[edit]

In Novak v. City of Parma, a case arising out of a Facebook page created by Anthony Novak in March 2016 to lampoon a local police department, satire website The Onion filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of Novak, arguing the police department took action against a clearly satirical expression of speech.[73] In October 2022, The Babylon Bee filed an amicus brief as well, supporting The Onion's position.[74][75] The Babylon Bee later published, but did not file, a satirical brief in support of the police department, arguing "[i]t is essential to protect those with coercive power who wield it for self-preserving ends... Our society can only function if people get their information from a tightly controlled source that has never lied to us, like the government or the police."[76][77] The Sixth Circuit had ruled that the officers were protected by qualified immunity, and the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal, leaving the Sixth Circuit decision in effect.[78]

Following the 2022 passage of The Hateful Conduct Law in New York (Section 394-CCC of New York's General Business law), Eugene Volokh, the Rumble video hosting website, and the Locals crowdfunding website filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction,[79] and a preliminary injunction was granted.[80] New York Attorney General Letitia James filed an appeal, which prompted The Babylon Bee to file an amicus brief in September 2023, in which they described the law as "regulat[ing] almost nothing but constitutionally protected speech."[81][82]

In response to legislation passed in Florida (Florida SB 7072) and Texas (Texas HB 20) in 2021 aimed to limit social media's ability to regulate content, the NetChoice trade association filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction in Moody v. NetChoice, LLC and NetChoice v. Paxton. Two federal courts of appeals split decisions, with the Fifth Circuit upholding an injunction and the Eleventh overturning an injunction. The resulting split prompted the Supreme Court to hear the cases jointly. After that announcement, The Babylon Bee and Not the Bee filed a joint amicus brief in January 2024 in support of both states' respective laws, arguing that social media companies have inconsistently applied content moderation standards to target conservative viewpoints.[83][84][85] In the brief, both The Babylon Bee and Not the Bee claimed they had experienced censorship from large social media platforms.[86]

Books

[edit]

The Babylon Bee published a book satirizing the Christian self-help industry, titled How to Be a Perfect Christian: Your Comprehensive Guide to Flawless Spiritual Living.[87] Founder Adam Ford retained ownership of the book when he sold The Babylon Bee.[87]

In November 2020, The Babylon Bee released a self-published collection of their greatest hits, titled The Sacred Texts of The Babylon Bee, Volume 1.[88]

In 2021, Mann and Joel Berry, The Babylon Bee's managing editor, published The Babylon Bee Guide to Wokeness.[21] In the first week after publication, it ranked 20th on Amazon's top seller list,[89] 22nd on USA Today's top seller list,[90] and fourth on Publishers Weekly's paperback bestsellers list,[91] and second on Bookscan's Christian non-fiction bestsellers list.[92]

In September 2022, The Babylon Bee released a book satirizing democracy in the United States, titled The Babylon Bee Guide to Democracy.[93]

In September 2023, The Babylon Bee released The Babylon Bee Guide to Gender, satirizing the LGBTQ community and gender identity.[94]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Sanneh, Kelefa (October 31, 2016). "The New Evangelical Moral Minority". The New Yorker. ISSN 0028-792X. Archived from the original on August 7, 2019. Retrieved August 15, 2019.
  2. ^ a b c d e Roose, Kevin (October 16, 2020). "How The Babylon Bee, a Right-Wing Satire Site, Capitalizes on Confusion". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
  3. ^ a b Smietana, Bob (April 4, 2016). "Fake news that's good for the soul". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 21, 2016. Retrieved January 24, 2023. The satire site, which began in early March, features witty headlines that poke fun at the foibles of churchgoers. The site is the brainchild of Adam Ford, 32, a Detroit dad who quit his day job a year and a half ago to produce Web content. His first project was Adam4d.com, a Web comic supported by small group of donors and a few ads. He's aiming bigger with the Babylon Bee, which he said attracted more than 1 million visitors in its first three weeks.
  4. ^ Graham, Jennifer (August 23, 2021). "Can Facebook take a joke? This parody account doesn't think so". Deseret News. Archived from the original on August 28, 2021. Retrieved August 28, 2021.
  5. ^ Persaud, Chris (May 10, 2022). "Babylon Bee CEO of Juno Beach backs Twitter firebrand who calls LGBTQ people pedophiles". The Palm Beach Post. Archived from the original on May 16, 2022. Retrieved May 11, 2022.
  6. ^ LaCapria, Kim (August 29, 2017). "Joel Osteen Sails Luxury Yacht Through Flooded Houston to Pass out Copies of His Book?". Snopes. Archived from the original on June 15, 2021. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
  7. ^ Alfonso, Fernando III (September 1, 2017). "Debunked: Fake Joel Osteen yacht story spreads after Hurricane Harvey shelter controversy". Houston Chronicle. Archived from the original on June 21, 2021. Retrieved June 24, 2021.
  8. ^ Roy, Jessica (August 30, 2017). "Your guide to spotting 'fake news' about Harvey (hint: there's no shark on the highway)". The Baltimore Sun. Archived from the original on April 17, 2022. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
  9. ^ Swift, Jim (September 1, 2021). "What Happened to the Babylon Bee?". The Bulwark. Archived from the original on June 19, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2021.
  10. ^ a b c d Graham, Jennifer (November 10, 2021). "How a preacher's son made The Babylon Bee sting". Deseret News. Archived from the original on November 12, 2021. Retrieved November 12, 2021.
  11. ^ Showalter, Brandon (May 22, 2018). "The Babylon Bee Sold; Former Owner Says Internet Centralization Big 'Threat' to Spread of Gospel". The Christian Post. Retrieved October 2, 2024.
  12. ^ "The Babylon Bee's Founder, Adam Ford, Has Sold the Site". Relevant Magazine. May 23, 2018. Retrieved October 2, 2024.
  13. ^ Showalter, Brandon (May 22, 2018). "The Babylon Bee Sold; Former Owner Says Internet Centralization Big 'Threat' to Spread of Gospel". The Christian Post. Retrieved April 19, 2024.
  14. ^ Gryboski, Michael (November 1, 2023). "Babylon Bee founder sells remaining stakes in popular Christian satire website". The Christian Post. Archived from the original on November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 8, 2023.
  15. ^ a b c d e Goldberg, Emma (October 11, 2020). "What 'The Babylon Bee' Thinks Is So Funny About Liberals". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved December 28, 2020.
  16. ^ a b Varney, James (January 3, 2021). "Satirical Babylon Bee: 'Paper of record' for conservatives". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on January 7, 2021. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  17. ^ a b "As Christian conservatives take to satire, the left is not amused". The Economist. January 22, 2022. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved January 24, 2023. But it does not spare the right. In 2019 it poked fun at Donald Trump for boasting that he had "done more for Christianity than Jesus". The article went viral, leading Snopes, a fact-checking outfit, to label it as satire after some people believed it was a real story. Then, last September, Mr Trump actually said in an interview: "Nobody has done more for Christianity, or for evangelicals, or for religion itself than I have." The Bee now frequently tweets its original satire side by side with a real media headline that fulfilled it.
  18. ^ a b c d e f Chokshi, Niraj (August 3, 2019). "Satire or Deceit? Christian Humor Site Feuds With Snopes". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 13, 2019. Retrieved August 16, 2019.
  19. ^ a b Isaacs, Susan E. (May 7, 2018). "Report: So-Called Christians Have Sense of Humor". Christianity Today. Archived from the original on February 26, 2021. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  20. ^ Darling, Daniel (April 29, 2016). "The Babylon Bee's Adam Ford Says the Church Needs Laughter". Christianity Today. Archived from the original on June 8, 2016. Retrieved June 11, 2016.
  21. ^ a b c Green, Emma (October 14, 2021). "The Christians Who Mock Wokeness for a Living". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on October 15, 2021. Retrieved October 15, 2021.
  22. ^ a b c d e Bach, Parker J. (June 22, 2021). "Can the Right Make Good Satire Without Collapsing Due to Fake News?". Slate. Archived from the original on January 9, 2022. Retrieved June 25, 2021.
  23. ^ Nagarajan, Shalini (December 22, 2021). "Elon Musk says he's sold enough Tesla stock to meet his 10% goal, after offloading another $548 million in shares". Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 27, 2022. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  24. ^ Rogers, Zachary (December 22, 2021). "Elon Musk says 'wokeness' is 'divisive, exclusionary, and hateful'". WCIV. The National Desk. Archived from the original on September 3, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  25. ^ Ortega Law, Jeannie (December 22, 2021). "Elon Musk says he agrees with the teachings of Jesus: 'There is great wisdom'". The Christian Post. Archived from the original on May 10, 2022. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  26. ^ a b Gillespie, Nick (August 24, 2022). "The Babylon Bee's Kyle Mann: 'I'm no more deserving of God's grace than a transgender person is'". Reason. Archived from the original on August 31, 2022. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
  27. ^ a b Rupar, Aaron (October 16, 2020). "Trump's fake news crisis, illustrated by two episodes over the last 24 hours". Vox. Archived from the original on March 20, 2021. Retrieved June 17, 2021.
  28. ^ Pesce, Nicole Lyn (October 16, 2020). "Trump shares satirical Babylon Bee story after Savannah Guthrie accuses him of retweeting conspiracies like 'someone's crazy uncle'". Market Watch. Archived from the original on July 15, 2021. Retrieved June 17, 2021.
  29. ^ Harsanyi, David (January 6, 2020). "Attacks on the Babylon Bee Are Attacks on Free Expression". National Review. Archived from the original on June 25, 2021. Retrieved June 17, 2021.
  30. ^ a b Spocchia, Gino (October 16, 2021). "Trump shares joke news article claiming Twitter is blocking negative Biden stories". The Independent. Retrieved June 22, 2021.
  31. ^ Garrett, R. Kelly; Bond, Robert; Poulsen, Shannon (August 16, 2019). "Too many people think satirical news is real". The Conversation. Archived from the original on February 17, 2021. Retrieved February 17, 2021.
  32. ^ a b Osterhoudt, John (September 26, 2019). The Babylon Bee Satirizes the Absurdities of American Politics. Snopes Doesn't Seem to Get the Joke (Television production). Reason TV. 3:08 minutes in. Archived from the original on February 2, 2021. Retrieved February 19, 2021. Snopes, which didn't respond to Reason's interview request, has said that a significant percentage of social media users mistake satire for real news. But Mann says that when making this claim, Snopes cited a methodologically flawed study in which participants were shown Babylon Bee headlines reworded and taken out of context.
  33. ^ "Fact Check – Satirical article by the Babylon Bee about Nancy Pelosi taken seriously". Reuters. April 27, 2021. Archived from the original on June 24, 2021. Retrieved June 12, 2021.
  34. ^ a b c d e Daniel Funke (March 2, 2018). "Should satire be flagged on Facebook? A Snopes debunk sparks controversy". Poynter Institute. Archived from the original on May 1, 2021. Retrieved May 1, 2021.
  35. ^ "Corrections and Clarifications". The Guardian. September 29, 2020. Retrieved June 17, 2021.
  36. ^ Jackson, David (October 16, 2020). "Trump retweets satirical news story about Joe Biden and Twitter". USA Today. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved December 28, 2020.
  37. ^ Gryboski, Michael (October 16, 2020). "Wayne Grudem, Babylon Bee CEO join 15,000 to sign statement supporting civil debate, rejecting 'cancel culture'". The Christian Post. Archived from the original on June 24, 2021. Retrieved June 12, 2021.
  38. ^ McCormack, John (April 3, 2021). "Why the Babylon Bee Won't Be Canceled". National Review. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved June 12, 2021.
  39. ^ Liedl, Jonathan (October 28, 2020). "Big Tech's Big Bias: Religious Conservatives Face 'Scary Pattern' of Censorship". National Catholic Register. Archived from the original on June 18, 2021. Retrieved June 12, 2021.
  40. ^ a b c Broderick, Ryan (July 31, 2019). "A Christian Satire Site Says Fact-Checkers Are Helping De-Platform Conservatives". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on August 13, 2019. Retrieved August 16, 2019.
  41. ^ Klar, Rebecca (August 19, 2020). "Christian satire website voices 'concern' over Twitter policy after it was labeled as 'spam'". The Hill. Archived from the original on June 24, 2021. Retrieved June 12, 2021.
  42. ^ a b Foley, Ryan (October 21, 2020). "Facebook demonetizes Babylon Bee over Mazie Hirono satire piece". The Christian Post. Archived from the original on February 25, 2022. Retrieved February 25, 2022.
  43. ^ Davidson, Lee (October 29, 2020). "Sen. Mike Lee asks social media giants for even one example of blocking liberal content. They struggle". The Salt Lake Tribune. Archived from the original on June 28, 2021. Retrieved June 28, 2021.
  44. ^ Gryboski, Michael (February 22, 2022). "Facebook censors Babylon Bee post on trans-identified 'Jeopardy!' champion as 'hate speech'". The Christian Post. Archived from the original on February 24, 2022. Retrieved February 25, 2022.
  45. ^ Ford, Adam [@Adam4d] (July 25, 2019). "So @snopes fact-checked @TheBabylonBee again. But this time it's particularly egregious and, well, kind of disturbing. And I'd like to talk about it" (Tweet). Retrieved January 30, 2024 – via Twitter.
  46. ^ "Important Announcement". The Babylon Bee. 2019. Archived from the original on August 4, 2019. Retrieved August 16, 2019.
  47. ^ Evon, Dan (July 30, 2019). "Did a Georgia Lawmaker Claim a Chick-fil-A Employee Told Her to Go Back to Her Country?". Snopes. Archived from the original on June 15, 2021. Retrieved January 24, 2023. Editors' Note: Some readers interpreted wording in a previous version of this fact check as imputing deceptive intent on the part of Babylon Bee in its original satirical piece about Georgia state Rep. Erica Thomas, and that was not the editors' aim. To address any confusion, we have revised some of the wording mostly for tone and clarity. We are in the process of pioneering industry standards for how the fact-checking industry should best address humor and satire.
  48. ^ "Let's Make Fact-Checking Even Better". Snopes. August 16, 2019. Archived from the original on June 15, 2021. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  49. ^ a b Mann, Kyle (August 21, 2021). "A 'Fact Checker' Declares War On Satire". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on February 16, 2021. Retrieved January 24, 2023. In response our CEO, Seth Dillon, instructed our lawyers to demand an edit of the article and appealed to the public on social media. The scolds at Snopes seemed to comply and removed the worst bits from their piece. But they then rolled out a new rating, "Labeled Satire," which is meant to suggest that we are somehow making jokes in bad faith. Here's the explanation of the new rating: "Not all content described by its creator or audience as 'satire' necessarily constitutes satire, and this rating does not make a distinction between 'real' satire and content that may not be effectively recognized or understood as satire despite being labeled as such."
  50. ^ "the babylon bee Archives". Snopes. Archived from the original on June 15, 2021. Retrieved August 16, 2019.
  51. ^ a b Richardson, Valerie (April 4, 2022). "Babylon Bee CEO: Twitter's Bee lockout may have been 'last straw' for Elon Musk". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on April 4, 2022. Retrieved April 11, 2022.
  52. ^ Klar, Rebecca (March 21, 2022). "Twitter suspends Babylon Bee for misgendering Rachel Levine". The Hill. Archived from the original on March 21, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  53. ^ Kaonga, Gerrard (March 21, 2022). "Why was The Babylon Bee suspended by Twitter? CEO Seth Dillon reacts to ban". Newsweek. Archived from the original on March 21, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  54. ^ Panreck, Hanna (March 24, 2022). "The Babylon Bee reacts to losing Twitter appeal: 'Doesn't change our position'". Fox News. Archived from the original on March 26, 2022. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  55. ^ a b c d "Musk's 'free speech' agenda dismantles safety work at Twitter, insiders say". The Washington Post. November 22, 2022. Archived from the original on November 22, 2022. Retrieved January 19, 2023.
  56. ^ McHale, Patrick (April 5, 2022). "Elon Musk Opined About Buying Twitter After Babylon Bee Ban". Bloomberg News. Retrieved April 2, 2024.
  57. ^ Kay, Grace (October 6, 2022). "Elon Musk's ex-wife is reportedly the mysterious phone contact 'TJ' who texted him about fighting 'woke-ism' at Twitter, and called the banning of a conservative satire site 'crazy'". Business Insider. Retrieved April 2, 2024.
  58. ^ Novak, Matt (October 4, 2022). "Mystery Person in Elon Musk Texts Who Encouraged Billionaire to Destroy Twitter Is Ex-Wife: Report". Gizmodo. Retrieved April 2, 2024.
  59. ^ Spangler, Todd (April 25, 2022). "Elon Musk Clinches Deal to Buy Twitter for $44 Billion". Variety. Archived from the original on April 25, 2022. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
  60. ^ Wallace-Wells, Benjamin (January 11, 2023). "What the Twitter Files Reveal About Free Speech and Social Media". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on January 19, 2023. Retrieved January 19, 2023.
  61. ^ Haroun, Azmi (November 22, 2022). "Elon Musk wanted to reinstate a right-wing satire account on day one as Twitter chief". Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 19, 2023. Retrieved January 24, 2023. Elon Musk had his sights set on bringing back the Twitter account for right-wing, Christian satire website The Babylon Bee on day one as Twitter's CEO in October. The account had been banned for anti-trans tweets aimed at a member of the Biden administration. The site's account was reinstated on Sunday, three weeks after his takeover of Twitter.
  62. ^ "JUST IN: Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon Testifies About Being Censored For Rachel Levine Joke". Forbes. March 28, 2023. Archived from the original on April 9, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023 – via YouTube.
  63. ^ a b Hagan, Victor (November 19, 2024). "Elon Musk calls Southern Poverty Law Center a 'criminal organization' after doxing claim". Montgomery Advertiser. Retrieved November 21, 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  64. ^ Newton, Creede and Squire, Megan (November 19, 2024). "Inside the Beehive". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved November 21, 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  65. ^ Scher, Brent (November 20, 2024). "'Smear Factory' SPLC Says It Targeted Bee Writers To Protect 'Safety Of Trans And Genderqueer Individuals'". Daily Wire. Retrieved November 21, 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  66. ^ Howell, Tom (April 14, 2023). "Babylon Bee, others file suit over new social media law in California". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved April 20, 2023.
  67. ^ Deese, Kaelan (April 13, 2023). "Babylon Bee complaint alleges California law gives power to censor its content". The Washington Examiner. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  68. ^ Day, Rebecca (August 22, 2023). "Calif. Judge Grants Bonta's Motion to Dismiss First Amendment Hate Speech Case". Communications Litigation Today. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  69. ^ "Babylon Bee files suit against humorless California censorship laws". Alliance Defending Freedom. September 30, 2024. Retrieved October 1, 2024.
  70. ^ Barkoukis, Leah (October 1, 2024). "The Babylon Bee Sues California Over New 'Deepfake' Laws". Townhall. Retrieved October 1, 2024.
  71. ^ Foust, Michael (October 1, 2024). "Babylon Bee Sues California over New Laws Regulating Political Satire". Crosswalk. Retrieved October 1, 2024.
  72. ^ Katzenberger, Tyler (October 2, 2024). "Judge blocks California deepfakes law that sparked Musk-Newsom row". Politico. Retrieved October 23, 2024.
  73. ^ Sherman, Mark (October 4, 2022). "The Onion and the Supreme Court. Not a parody". AP News. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  74. ^ Sullum, Jacob (November 1, 2022). "'The Babylon Bee' joins 'The Onion' in decrying an Ohio law that makes parody a felony". Reason. Archived from the original on November 19, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  75. ^ Amicus Br. of Babylon Bee in Supp. of Pet'r Archived January 30, 2024, at the Wayback Machine, Novak v. City of Parma, No. 22-293.
  76. ^ Sibilla, Nick (November 6, 2022). "Babylon Bee Files Real Supreme Court Brief Defending The First Amendment Right To Make Fun Of Cops". Forbes. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  77. ^ Volokh, Eugene (October 28, 2022). "Babylon Bee Files Amicus Brief in Support of Parody Rights — and Doesn't File an Amicus Brief Opposing It". Reason. Archived from the original on December 8, 2022. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  78. ^ Cushing, Tim (February 22, 2023). "Supreme Court Passes On Important Parody Case, Allows Cops To Treat Satire As A Criminal Act In The Sixth Circuit". Techdirt. Archived from the original on September 12, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  79. ^ Klasfeld, Adam (December 1, 2022). "Rumble and Law Professor Sue New York Attorney General to Block Online Hate Speech Law, Calling It a First Amendment 'Double Whammy'". Law & Crime. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  80. ^ Greiner, Jack (March 2, 2023). "Strictly Legal: Court strikes down "hateful speech" law". The Cincinnati Enquirer. Archived from the original on March 28, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  81. ^ Richardson, Valerie (October 4, 2023). "Babylon Bee takes on New York AG Letitia James over state's hate speech law". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  82. ^ Amicus Br. of Babylon Bee in Supp. of Appellees Archived January 30, 2024, at the Wayback Machine, Volokh v. James, No. 23-356.
  83. ^ Dallas, Kelsey (January 26, 2024). "Why The Babylon Bee filed a Supreme Court brief". Deseret News. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  84. ^ Williams, Patrick (June 2, 2022). "Supreme Court Blocks Texas Law Intended to Keep Conservative Viewpoints Alive on Social Media". Dallas Observer. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  85. ^ Amicus Br. of Babylon Bee and Not the Bee in Supp. of Pet'r Archived January 30, 2024, at the Wayback Machine, Moody v. NetChoice, Nos. 22-277 and 22-555.
  86. ^ Gryboski, Michael (September 15, 2021). "Babylon Bee joins legal battle in support of Florida law fighting social media censorship". The Christian Post. Archived from the original on September 15, 2021. Retrieved September 15, 2021.
  87. ^ a b Ford, Adam. "I sold The Babylon Bee and am no longer running it". Adam4d.com. Archived from the original on August 19, 2019. Retrieved August 19, 2019.
  88. ^ "The Sacred Texts of The Babylon Bee, Volume 1". Babylon Bee Store. Archived from the original on November 13, 2020. Retrieved November 13, 2020.
  89. ^ "Amazon Charts, Week of November 7, 2021". Amazon. November 7, 2021. Archived from the original on November 12, 2021. Retrieved November 12, 2021.
  90. ^ "Best-Selling Books Top 150" (PDF). USA Today. November 7, 2021. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2021. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  91. ^ "Publishers Weekly Top Trade Paper Frontlist". Publishers Weekly. November 7, 2021. Archived from the original on November 20, 2021. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  92. ^ "Christian Non-Fiction Bestsellers, December 2021". Read Good Books. December 2021. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved December 4, 2021.
  93. ^ "Available Now: The Babylon Bee Guide To Democracy". The Babylon Bee. Archived from the original on September 6, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
  94. ^ "The Babylon Bee Guide To Gender Is Available Now!". The Babylon Bee. Archived from the original on September 19, 2023. Retrieved September 19, 2023.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Babylon_Bee&oldid=1258967617"