Jump to content

Talk:Zenbook

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleZenbook has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 25, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 15, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the concentric circles on the lid of a Zenbook are designed to look like ripples in water?

Guild of Copy Editors request

[edit]

Off the GOCE request page, I did a edit of this page on 5 March to help it read easier. I think it does. Regards Montykillies (talk) 00:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC) Montykillies (talk) 00:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead needs to mention it is almost a clone of the Mac Air

[edit]

Inspired by the Mac Book air design needs to be added to lead.--Inayity (talk) 17:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 November 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: mixed no consensus, moved to Zenbook. Two issues at play here, the inclusion of Asus and the capitalization of "b" in Zen(b)ook. I generally find stronger consensus against the capitalization of "b" and given that was the stable title prior to the undiscussed move, there is a case here for omitting the capitalized "b". I find no consensus for the inclusion of the brand name "Asus" so it will remain unchanged without the inclusion in the article title. As with any no consensus closure, this may be discussed further at a later date. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


ZenBookAsus Zenbook – Branding as per logo shown has 'Asus' prefix and the 'B' is not uppercase Sceeegt (talk) 23:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). 2pou (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. JJPMaster (she/they) 02:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sourcing has mixed uses between sentence case and camel case. Since a prior move to the current case was performed, this should probably go to discussion to reach a real consensus. -2pou (talk) 00:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mixed because the capitalized version was previously used and is seen on older sources, now it's been rebranded. Sceeegt (talk) 00:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment: Contested at RM/TR; so wider discussion is needed JJPMaster (she/they) 02:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Partial Support: Agree with including Asus, no comments about capitalization of B. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:44, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If you could take a look at the official site of the product, the B is not capitalized in both the text and the wordmark brandings. Nor is it capitalized in official press reports. If 3rd party is necessary too, NY Times doesn't capitalize it either. Sceeegt (talk) 19:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support dropping the case since don't strictly follow trademark names or stylizations, but there needs to be overwhelming support to utilize alternate casing, as it's currently titled. While I believe there is no need to include ASUS as it is already disambiguated enough, the nuance of how things like electronics are marketed, advertised and talked about, makes establishing commonname a bit more tricky, because it's more of a generic convention than anything else. TiggerJay(talk) 07:08, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.