This page is not a forum for general discussion about ChatGPT. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about ChatGPT at the Reference desk.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The name "Orion" isn't widely used, so I would avoid that. The title "OpenAI o1 (GPT)" is a bit more explicit, but it doesn't look very clean. By the way, I guess we can continue to use "o1" instead of "OpenAI o1" in the rest of the article, newspapers seem to do that also. Alenoach (talk) 23:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Isn't Strawberry the name of the training algorithm?
Thought Strawberry is the name of the new training algorithm that is precisely not normal reinforcement learning, because RL tends to make the model answers converge on certain path, while Strawberry generates a model with a property they call diverse in the sense, that it generates a hole spectrum of path instead of converging onto one only. This spectrum, multi-angle thinking then makes models trained with Strawberry much better suitable for Chain of Thought / Autonomous agent kinds of prompting techniques.
Of course all of this is just rumors, bits&pieces because we are at a point where market dominance and monopoly desires lead to a situation where the research itself is not published to benefit humanity, like in basically all science before. A tragedy 2A00:20:6045:EA22:1068:4F19:6E53:4C33 (talk) 21:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I think that strawberry is the name of the model o1 itself rather than the training algorithm, as said for example here.[1] OpenAI gives limited details about how it works. We know that reinforcement learning is being used (possibly among other techniques), OpenAI said it itself.[2]
If I understand correctly: It was notably trained on many problems that have a known correct answer. It generates long chain of thoughts with a high "temperature" (i.e. creativity), and the chain-of-thoughts that get to the good result (and that are estimated by another model to follow good reasoning steps) are rewarded. But if no reliable source precisely explains how it works, I would avoid speculating inside the article. Alenoach (talk) 22:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]