The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
Wow. What a biased article. You guys aren't hiding your Big Pharma agenda, are you? So eating "raw foods" and using "alternative medicine" is "pseudoscience?" LOL You do realize, right, that not too many generations ago, ALL medicine was what you would call "alternative?" It's also ESTABLISHED SCIENCE that cooking destroys much of the nutrients and enzymes in fruit and vegetables. I guess you'd consider that pseudoscience too, huh? 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:544F:E012:2320:EFE4 (talk) 17:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We follow reliable sources. If you have reliable sources contradicting those used by the article, bring them.
Hint: You don't need to mention any sources whose reasoning goes along the lines of "this person disagrees with me, therefore they must be in the pay of Big Pharma" because sources with such abysmal reasoning ability are obviously garbage. --Hob Gadling (talk) 18:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There was no valid source for him being an advocate for a flat earth movement and it it was on his page. That shows a serious bias if you ask me. I have edited it accordingly. --Zaurus (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have distilled down over 20 years of this man's work into a window of 2020 where (I do not know but you claim) he rightfully expressed his views of breathing fresh air and not injecting yourself with toxins. This is why freedom is so important because of course someone who is dedicated to a natural lifestyle will not support forcing toxins onto people. Rebreathing your CO2 is not healthy no matter how many false "studies" you want to try to create about it. For the fact alone you start the article with namecalling and labeling - that is BIASED further you have almost nothing notable about his great work introducing the western world to many superfoods. This awful unbalanced attacking has lost me as wikipedia supporter... clearly you don't need my support though you are getting $$$ from other interests 162.142.119.16 (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Given his reputation for inflating (inventing?) his educational bona fides, is it possible to find a better source for his claimed education? 2.101.30.65 (talk) 15:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
