Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Mendes
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jordan Mendes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
biography article based on the one event of his murder and one news source. Not notable and WP:NOTNEWS. No assertion of encyclopedic significance. Scott Mac (Doc) 17:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTNEWS Secret account 18:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:BLP1E. Joe Chill (talk) 22:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable. GreyWyvern (talk) 23:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's notable for the area in that it brought up the basic "what are we teaching out kids..." discussion. I can find sources for this debate soon, but it's late now. By the way, I didn't intentionally write, "this is notable..." stuff into the article. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the Cape Cod Times charges for archive use, so I ditched them. I did add a Fox News and a Boston Globe source. I can find more, but that will require significant digging. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources can be easily found on the subject, I remembered this case when it came out on CNN, etc, but it died down after a day or two, I don't see why this article is newsworthy enough for it's own page. If an article is created on every piece of news that makes the Associated Press rounds, it will easily be in the millions. WP:NOTNEWS was created for a reason. Secret account 14:43, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per WP:BLP1E.--Staberinde (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.