Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game Guru

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Game Network. The consensus is that there are not enough sources for an article, but several people indicate that a redirect could be useful. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 10:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Game Guru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for primary sources for 2 years-plus. No reliable sources found anywhere. Fails WP:GNG in all senses. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Bundy Jr. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:14, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 03:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete profoundly non-notable. Only hint of notability is the unsourced claim that it spawned an internet meme, this appears to be false (or very minor if true, as I can't find it anywhere). Chances are if no reliable sources have been found in the 2 years since it's been tagged, that's because no such sources exist. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge & Redirect to Game Network (in the appropriate section). There is some sourcable information, but not enough to establish notability on its own. Turlo Lomon (talk) 17:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 08:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability. —Half Price 18:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or failing that, Merge into Game Network as it was the channel's main show.--FirecrackerDemon (talk) 14:13, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Game Network; not enough coverage to warrant an independent article, and not much verifiable info to merge. /ƒETCH COMMS / 02:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect What Fetchcomms said. Sven Manguard _Talk 06:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.