Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furious 8 (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Fast and the Furious#Fast 8 (2017) . Closing as Merge as Redirects are always created after Merges anyway (non-admin closure)Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:16, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Furious 8 (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filming hasn't been announced yet; draft is already in the works. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 02:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MusaTalk ☻ 02:10, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MusaTalk ☻ 02:10, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to The Fast and the Furious#Fast 8 (2017). WP:TOOSOON for a page, but a valid redirect if 'Furious 8' is the most recent "official" title. Aspirex (talk) 06:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The content in the article is not wrong. All the information can be verified as It is cited with reliable sources. There is no need to delete the article. If it's created some time before that doesn't means it should be deleted or redirected and created after some time.--MusaTalk ☻ 08:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@4TheWynne: You're saying that the draft is better so the this article should be turned into a redirect. But the article is not fully protected it can be edited by anyone and can be made better. There is no solid reason to move or delete it.--MusaTalk ☻ 09:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.