Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darius Dar Khan
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Darius Dar Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
When this article was new I reverted my own nomination for speedy deletion because I found a reference that tipped it only just into the probably almost notable ranks. Since that time I have come to doubt my self reversion, and feel that the gentleman does not stand up to WP:GNG. There has been a substantial time to allow development of the article, but nothing substantive has appeared. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Does not seem to meet notability. SYSS Mouse (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.